18 June 1986
Rodden Rating: XX
Notes: got inspired by his documentary of "what is a woman?" & decided to analyze his birthchart. Location is unknown but I set it to the place he grew up in. Notice his mercury opposing mercury which could indicate "heated discussions, hostile conversations, verbal arguments, controversial assertions, & strong opinions". Saturn is also hard aspecting both of these planets which is more serious, practical & blunt in their approach of the conversation. The focus for this reading is based on his sun placement.
Rodden Rating: XX
Notes: got inspired by his documentary of "what is a woman?" & decided to analyze his birthchart. Location is unknown but I set it to the place he grew up in. Notice his mercury opposing mercury which could indicate "heated discussions, hostile conversations, verbal arguments, controversial assertions, & strong opinions". Saturn is also hard aspecting both of these planets which is more serious, practical & blunt in their approach of the conversation. The focus for this reading is based on his sun placement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07b26/07b265ed16fa77d661ea57c3153d3e9e6c722e22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43054/43054b1e08d3a061f03eec7f3b73b6bd3345752f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/722fb/722fbfafa186301684d5e1f17c1406d722f1c087" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd5a/ccd5aa5be3064b0bf1c61fcb40977fc7b4c61e7f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a555/0a555e7c6ed16af09f014978cf4cd4b386d99926" alt=""
Ian: "what do you think these riddles mean as a whole? Explain this detailed summary of events."
Chatgpt o1: "These riddles highlight a conservative viewpoint concerned with preserving certain values around how children should grow and learn. They suggest that in many modern discussions, some individuals or groups accept questionable beliefs without scrutiny, allowing “degenerates” to influence or prey upon the vulnerable. From this perspective, those who raise alarm or question these ideas are dismissed or labeled as irrational, yet they maintain that genuine child development relies on straightforward truth rather than convoluted ideologies. There’s also the implication that excessive politeness or deference to popular trends can obscure important realities, causing society to fail in protecting and guiding the innocent. Additionally, the riddles convey frustration with academic or social institutions that promote dubious concepts and then dodge responsibility for any resulting confusion or harm. The text hints at people feeling “triggered” when confronted with a more grounded understanding of the world, pointing to underlying tension between what is seen as basic common sense and ideas deemed illogical or radical. Ultimately, it presents a world in which facts about children and societal well-being are continually twisted or ignored by an array of ill-informed contributors, while a lone critical voice attempts to cut through the noise and warn others of the detrimental effects."
Chatgpt o1: "These riddles highlight a conservative viewpoint concerned with preserving certain values around how children should grow and learn. They suggest that in many modern discussions, some individuals or groups accept questionable beliefs without scrutiny, allowing “degenerates” to influence or prey upon the vulnerable. From this perspective, those who raise alarm or question these ideas are dismissed or labeled as irrational, yet they maintain that genuine child development relies on straightforward truth rather than convoluted ideologies. There’s also the implication that excessive politeness or deference to popular trends can obscure important realities, causing society to fail in protecting and guiding the innocent. Additionally, the riddles convey frustration with academic or social institutions that promote dubious concepts and then dodge responsibility for any resulting confusion or harm. The text hints at people feeling “triggered” when confronted with a more grounded understanding of the world, pointing to underlying tension between what is seen as basic common sense and ideas deemed illogical or radical. Ultimately, it presents a world in which facts about children and societal well-being are continually twisted or ignored by an array of ill-informed contributors, while a lone critical voice attempts to cut through the noise and warn others of the detrimental effects."
Copyright © 2024 by Ian Murphy
All rights reserved. This work, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the author.
All rights reserved. This work, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the author.