My Methodology

1. Core Premise: A Sequence of Variables is Responsible for Animating Things in Reality

The model posits that a set of 8 variables —that's mathematically executed using a piecewise function— not only forms the basis of man & woman (e.g. traditional roles, characteristics, & behaviors of masculine & feminine expression) but also underpins & animates the patterns & themes we can see in our observable world. These variables represent universal archetypes, each associated with specific meanings derived from an extensive english glossary (which will hopefully serve as a foundation to incorperate the vast array of distinct languages in the world). The mathematical framework of the model —the piecewise function— systematically generates sequences that mirror the dynamics of real-world phenomena. Additionally, by focusing on multiples of 45 degrees (which is a direct consequence of dividing a 360 degree zodiacal wheel using the 8 variables) this will form the basis of all useful relational aspects moving forward to account for any discrepencies & help identify motifs across diverse contexts (such as individual behaviors, historical events or creative expressions). This system offers a structured method for exploring the thematic architecture of reality. Much like how archetypal narratives recur in literature or patterns in natural systems, these sequences reveal consistent themes that align with observable phenomena, providing a novel lens for understanding reality's complexity & our possible role in it.

2. Demonstrable Correlations Between Variables and Phenomena

The model showcases its utility through examples that highlight thematic correlations. For instance, the narrative derived from the release date of Terrifier 3 closely mirrors the thematic essence of a real-life event, the San Ysidro McDonald's Massacre, perpetrated by James Oliver Huberty. Both are linked through the astrological placements (18 & 17 Libra) analyzed via the model using the sequence represented as C (to represent the constant) while the delta sign represents the zodiacal outlier (Mars). Although, mars is located at different angles, by using the multiples of 45 degrees starting from each of their sun placements we can see the obvious connection. The Sun represents the overall central essence of the person/event while mars introduces themes of violence, aggression, and hostiility. Within the exact sequence for the constant, they both share the first three variables (Saturn, Uranus & Mars) describing an environment where the "situation (♄) is potentially (⛢) dangerous (♂)" as well as "activity (♂) that's extremely (⛢) inhumane (♄)". A more detailed analysis can be found by looking at their individual pages. What these correlations demonstrate is the model’s ability to identify shared patterns across seemingly unrelated events. While it doesn’t claim causation, the alignment of themes and variables underscores the model’s capacity to generate narratives that resonate deeply with the essence of the phenomena analyzed.

The strength of the model lies in its systematic approach:

A) Astrological placements are calculated to precise degrees using an ephemeris or readily available astrological chart generator.
B) Aspects (of 45 degrees) are filtered through strict criteria (e.g., tight orbs of 0-2 degrees) to ensure relevance and accuracy.
C) The sequence of variables is generated through a piecewise function, where x equals the number of levels. Navigating each level in depth introduces a structured complexity without compromising interpretability.
D) Use Johndro's Astrological Dictionary to repeatedly abuse the words in each category which not only unmasks the meaning of each variable in the sequence but also diversifies the range of possible outcomes to explore without making the word combinations dull & boring.
E) Adhere to practical down-to earth statements to avoid overly abstract, mystical or patently absurd word combinations. (ie. wizards & warlocks)
F) After thoroughly exhausting the number of coherent statements, compile & organize the list of sentences so that there is a clear structural narrative or lesson at play where character development occurs from start to finish.

This systematic methodology avoids arbitrary conclusions and ensures that the generated sequences are consistent, repeatable, and grounded in defined rules. The structured use of variables and their relationships creates a clear framework that can be applied uniformly across various datasets.

The model’s adaptability makes it valuable in a range of applications:

A) In storytelling, it identifies archetypal patterns that resonate with audiences, aiding both analysis and creation.
B) In historical analysis, it uncovers recurring themes in events, providing a fresh lens for understanding societal trends or conflicts.
C) In personal exploration, it offers individuals a structured framework for interpreting their own experiences or attributes.

These applications highlight the model’s ability to produce insights that are both practical and intellectually engaging. By revealing patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed, it provides a tool for exploration across diverse fields, from art to psychology to cultural studies.

Skeptics might question whether the sequences generated by the model is merely coincidental or reflective of genuine relationships. The model's primary function is to be used as a pattern-recognition tool rather than a deterministic framework. Its purpose is not to claim that the variables cause phenomena but to reveal underlying structures and motifs that consistently align with observed events. This distinction is critical: the model’s value lies in its ability to uncover meaningful correlations that enrich understanding, not in asserting direct causal links. It operates much like linguistic analysis or symbolic interpretation, where the identification of patterns offers insights without requiring absolute certainty about their origins.

Another concern that has been toted about is that this pattern of selecting random words from the same variable not only degrades the meaning of the words (by over emphasizing synonyms as flexible) but is the hallmark of relativism as it appears too vague or open-ended. By arbitrarily selecting any words from a category how can one determine the reliability of the system if its justifying a personal subjective preference? Without absolute definitions this means it will lack objective grounding & remain inconsistent. This is not so, while the methodology may not be in agreement with the views supporting traditional absolutism because it avoids the rigid constraints & strict rules of grammar it is not purely subjective or open to interpretation because the criteria for deriving meanings are fixed and systematic grounded in the essence of predefined variables which excludes unrelated concepts. For example: you can not derive the word "stupid" or "dense" from the mercury variable in the sequence this is impossible & solely belongs to saturn. More complex words such as "Variety" which could quality it to be in different variables largely depends on the context. This makes it structured contextualism. Let's continue with this idea: If for example: "Variety" is used in terms of succession of order then it is qualified as Jupiter, if its used in terms of diversity (difference without order, or an unorderly assortment of many things) it belongs with Neptune (as its more to do with the mixing & collection of many) if its to mean different & seperate then this would be Uranus. The word "Transportation" is inherently Uranus since it means conveyance on land by train, truck, automobile but when we mean shipping overseas it is a Neptune word qualified by Uranus.